[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vce0oh2a.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:51:49 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with the tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the modules tree got a conflict in
> kernel/module.c between commit caabe240574a ("MODSIGN: Move the magic
> string to the end of a module and eliminate the search") from Linus' tree
> and commit 0250abdeec54 ("module: add syscall to load module from fd")
> from the modules tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
>
> I do wonder why the above change in Linus' tree seems to have bypassed
> the modules maintainer.
Yes. David tacked it on to a real bugfix which went straight to Linus;
having fixed my mess I couldn't complain too much (though I had NAKed
similar patches in the past).
I will rebase my -next tree today.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists