[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5087D574.4030503@free-electrons.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:48:04 +0200
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Ian Molton <ian.molton@...ethink.co.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@...vell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>,
Eran Ben-Avi <benavi@...vell.com>,
Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Ike Pan <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
Jani Monoses <jani.monoses@...onical.com>,
Chris Van Hoof <vanhoof@...onical.com>,
Dan Frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@....com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
David Marlin <dmarlin@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: mvebu: Add hardware I/O Coherency support
On 10/24/2012 01:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> +void __init armada_370_xp_coherency_iocache_init(void)
>> +{
>> + /* When the coherency fabric is available, the Armada XP and
>> + * Aramada 370 are close to a coherent architecture, so we based
>> + * our dma ops on the coherent one, and just changes the
>> + * operations which need a arch io sync */
>> + if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "marvell,coherency-fabric")) {
>> + struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops = &armada_xp_dma_ops;
>> + memcpy(dma_ops, &arm_coherent_dma_ops, sizeof(*dma_ops));
>> + dma_ops->map_page = armada_xp_dma_map_page;
>> + dma_ops->unmap_page = armada_xp_dma_unmap_page;
>> + dma_ops->unmap_sg = arm_dma_ops.unmap_sg;
>> + dma_ops->sync_single_for_cpu = armada_xp_dma_sync;
>> + dma_ops->sync_single_for_device = armada_xp_dma_sync;
>> + dma_ops->sync_sg_for_cpu = arm_dma_ops.sync_sg_for_cpu;
>> + dma_ops->sync_sg_for_device = arm_dma_ops.sync_sg_for_device;
>> + }
>> + bus_register_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &armada_xp_platform_nb);
>
> I think it would be cleaner to statically define the operations in a constant
> structure and point directly to the functions you need. If necessary, use
> multiple structures.
My problem was that these functions are not exposed, only arm_dma_op and
arm_coherent_dma_ops are exported.
Or do you think about something like this:
struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops = {
.alloc = arm_dma_ops.arm_coherent_dma_alloc,
.free = arm_dma_ops.arm_coherent_dma_free,
.mmap = arm_dma_ops.arm_dma_mmap,
.get_sgtable = arm_dma_ops.arm_dma_get_sgtable,
.map_sg = arm_dma_ops.arm_dma_map_sg,
.set_dma_mask = arm_dma_ops.arm_dma_set_mask,
.map_page = armada_xp_dma_map_page,
.unmap_page = armada_xp_dma_unmap_page,
.unmap_sg = arm_dma_ops.unmap_sg,
.sync_single_for_cpu = armada_xp_dma_sync,
.sync_single_for_device = armada_xp_dma_sync,
.sync_sg_for_cpu = arm_dma_ops.sync_sg_for_cpu,
.sync_sg_for_device = arm_dma_ops.sync_sg_for_device,
};
>
> Arnd
>
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists