linux-kernel - Re: [Request for review] Revised delete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKgNAki5NbXWU8i7DtCEqAt=3pG+OtZe9E+Wm3xjJGD-sDbO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:47:43 +0200
From:	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To:	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Subject: Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

Lucas,

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Lucas De Marchi
<lucas.de.marchi@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>> Ping!
>>
>> Rusty (et al.) I'm pretty sure the new page text is okay, but I would
>> like someone knowledgeable to confirm.
>
> One more thing:
>
>> .SH "SEE ALSO"
>> .BR create_module (2),
>> .BR init_module (2),
>> .BR query_module (2),
>> .BR lsmod (8),
>> .BR rmmod (8)
>
> Shouldn't we remove the reference to query_module(2) and
> create_module(2)? They don't exist anymore (and I miss a bigger
> warning on their man pages).

I think the SEE ALSO links should be kept, but you are right that the
warnings that query_module(2) and create_module(2) no longer exist
should be more prominent on those pages. By chance, I'd already made
that change.

> Last, I think there should be a ref here to modprobe (because of -r
> flag), not lsmod. The rest looks good.

I'll add modprobe(8); I think lsmod(8) is worth keeping.

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface"; http://man7.org/tlpi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/