[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5087F5B9.0@free-electrons.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:05:45 +0200
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Ian Molton <ian.molton@...ethink.co.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@...vell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>,
Eran Ben-Avi <benavi@...vell.com>,
Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Ike Pan <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
Jani Monoses <jani.monoses@...onical.com>,
Chris Van Hoof <vanhoof@...onical.com>,
Dan Frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@....com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
David Marlin <dmarlin@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: mvebu: adding SATA support: dt binding and config
update
On 10/24/2012 04:01 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Shouldn't you split into one commit adding the SATA definition in
> the .dtsi + doing the defconfig change (the "SoC" level modifications),
> and then another commit for the .dts change? I don't really care
> personally, it's really up to Jason/Andrew on this.
>
> Another comment below, though.
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:49:21 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi
>> index 94b4b9e..3f08233 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi
>> @@ -69,6 +69,16 @@
>> compatible = "marvell,armada-addr-decoding-controller";
>> reg = <0xd0020000 0x258>;
>> };
>> +
>> + sata@...a0000 {
>> + compatible = "marvell,orion-sata";
>> + reg = <0xd00a0000 0x2400>;
>> + interrupts = <55>;
>> + nr-ports = <2>;
>> + clocks = <&coreclk 0>;//, <&coreclk 0>;
>
> Alignment problem + remainings of tests or something like that.
True I missed this one.
Jason, Andrew, do you want I split this patch as suggested by Thomas or
are you fine with having one single patch?
I will wait your answer before sending the V2.
Thanks,
Gregory
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists