[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121024145308.GE3537@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:53:08 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: Standardise capability type
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities
> > are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them
> > to elevate any confusion.
> >
> > Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
> > Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> Why make it "unsigned long" then? I think that adds to the
> confusion because it's sometimes 32 bits and sometimes 64 bits,
> depending on the CPU. Since it's a bitmask, I would suggest
> using u32 to make the size explicit.
I'm not sure that it leaves any confusion. It perhaps wastes a little
space on 64bit architectures, but that also applies to a great deal
of other bitmasks floating around.
I can do it if you feel that passionate about it, but it's a bigger
job to hunt down all occurrences and change them over. I only felt
strongly enough about it to craft this patch because I noticed the
inconsistency as I created new populate caps for OF functionality.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists