[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121024151100.GA16793@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:11:00 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use light/heavy barriers
On 10/23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:23 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > static void mb_ipi(void *arg)
> > {
> > smp_mb(); /* unneeded ? */
> > }
> >
> > static void force_mb_on_each_cpu(void)
> > {
> > smp_mb();
> > smp_call_function(mb_ipi, NULL, 1);
> > }
>
> You know we're spending an awful lot of time and effort to get rid of
> such things, right? RT and HPC people absolutely hate these random IPI
> things.
No I do not know ;) but I am not suprized.
And,
> > I have to admit, I have
> > no idea how much cli/sti is slower compared to preempt_disable/enable.
> >
> A lot.. esp on stupid hardware (insert pentium-4 reference), but I think
> its more expensive for pretty much all hardware,
Thanks Peter, this alone answers my question.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists