[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1351047760.6537.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:02:40 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, devel@...nvz.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] posix timers: allocate timer id per process
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 00:33 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 23:47 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > > Not so good to me.
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > And that should be either an Acked-by or a Reviewed-by. You can't sign
> > > off on patches which have not been submitted or transported by you.
> >
> > I actually gave some input, provided a hash function, and so on.
> >
> > So this SOB was valid. I do that all the time.
>
> Not really. I recommend you to read the relevant file in Documentation
> which covers what can have your SOB.
OK I did that again, and found this :
The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery
path.
And I was involved in the development of the patch.
I understand you dont like it at all, so I'll remember not trying to
help anymore in this area.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists