linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/06] input/rmi4: Public header and documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121024174908.GI18814@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:49:08 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Allie Xiong <axiong@...aptics.com>,
	Vivian Ly <vly@...aptics.com>,
	Daniel Rosenberg <daniel.rosenberg@...aptics.com>,
	Joerie de Gram <j.de.gram@...il.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@...ricsson.com>,
	Alexandra Chin <alexandra.chin@...synaptics.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/06] input/rmi4: Public header and documentation

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:10:20PM -0700, Christopher Heiny wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 10:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:56:22AM +0000, Christopher Heiny wrote:

> >Fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs.

> Sorry - I was on the road and had to use a web interface.  It looked
> OK during composition.  Is this better?

Yes, that's great - thanks.

> However, a general capability in SPI core is a fine idea for future
> work, once we get the RMI4 driver ironed out.  Can we agree to defer
> that for now?

Obviously there's no pressure to implement the framework feature,
however it shouldn't be implemented at the driver level.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)