[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121024184337.GD13993@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:43:37 -0700
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, davem@...emloft.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] tools, perf: Fix up for x86 UAPI disintegration
Em Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:55:58PM +0100, David Howells escreveu:
>
> Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
> applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
Borislav, Namhyung, can you take a look at this series?
- Arnaldo
> There are five patches:
>
> (1) Use a makefile $(call ...) function in tools/Makefile to make it easier
> to deal with.
>
> [NOTE! I think the rule for selftests_install is wrong since it attempts
> to discard '_clean' from the end of the target name instead of
> '_install']
>
> (2) Fix handling of O= with a relative path when doing something like:
>
> make tools/perf O=foo
>
> from the top-level directory in the kernel source tree for all tools.
>
> (3) Make perf work for x86 by adding -I flags and changing long #includes
> with "../../include" in them into short <asm/foo.h> type things.
>
> Now there are two patches that I'm not sure whether you want. There are three
> header files with bits used by perf that are not in the UAPI. If these are
> disintegrated then perf does not need to look in any KAPI headers at all and
> the -I flag pointing there can be dropped after the first of these patches.
>
> (4) UAPI disintegrate asm/svm.h and asm/vmx.h.
>
> (5) UAPI disintegrate asm/perf_regs.h and convert a "../../include" style
> path into <asm/perf_regs.h>.
>
> I'm not sure whether these should be exported to userspace, though this commit:
>
> commit 26bf264e871a4b9a8ac09c21a2b518e7f23830d5
> Author: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon Sep 17 16:31:13 2012 +0800
> KVM: x86: Export svm/vmx exit code and vector code to userspace
>
> suggests that at least the first two should be - though since it didn't modify
> Kbuild, this was not effective.
>
> I haven't tried building perf for other arches at this time.
>
> David
> ---
> David Howells (5):
> x86: UAPI Disintegrate asm/perf_regs.h
> x86: Disintegrate asm/svm.h and asm/vmx.h to produce UAPI components for perf
> perf: Make perf build for x86 with UAPI disintegration applied
> tools: Honour the O= flag when tool build called from a higher Makefile
> tools: Define a Makefile function to do subdir processing
>
>
> Makefile | 6 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_regs.h | 33 --------
> arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 133 -------------------------------
> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 87 --------------------
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 33 ++++++++
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/Makefile | 24 +++---
> tools/perf/Makefile | 15 +++
> tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h | 2
> tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c | 6 +
> tools/perf/perf.h | 16 +---
> tools/scripts/Makefile.include | 18 ++++
> 13 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 283 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_regs.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists