linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] compiler-gcc{3,4}.h: Use GCC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:05:46 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	danielfsantos@....net
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
	Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] compiler-gcc{3,4}.h: Use GCC_VERSION macro

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:33:54AM -0500, danielfsantos@....net wrote:
> Using GCC_VERSION reduces complexity, is easier to read and is GCC's
> recommended mechanism for doing version checks. (Just don't ask me why
> they didn't define it in the first place.)  This also makes it easy to
> merge compiler-gcc{,3,4}.h should somebody want to.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h |    8 ++++----
>  include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h |   14 +++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h
> index 37d4124..7d89feb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc3.h
> @@ -2,22 +2,22 @@
>  #error "Please don't include <linux/compiler-gcc3.h> directly, include <linux/compiler.h> instead."
>  #endif
>  
> -#if __GNUC_MINOR__ < 2
> +#if GCC_VERSION < 30200
>  # error Sorry, your compiler is too old - please upgrade it.
>  #endif
>  
> -#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 3
> +#if GCC_VERSION >= 30300
>  # define __used			__attribute__((__used__))
>  #else
>  # define __used			__attribute__((__unused__))
>  #endif
>  
> -#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4
> +#if GCC_VERSION >= 30400
>  #define __must_check		__attribute__((warn_unused_result))
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL
> -# if __GNUC_MINOR__ < 4
> +# if GCC_VERSION < 30400
>  #   error "GCOV profiling support for gcc versions below 3.4 not included"
>  # endif /* __GNUC_MINOR__ */
>  #endif /* CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL */
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h
> index 8914293..9755029 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  
>  /* GCC 4.1.[01] miscompiles __weak */
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> -# if __GNUC_MINOR__ == 1 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <= 1
> +# if GCC_VERSION >= 40100 &&  GCC_VERSION <= 40101
>  #  error Your version of gcc miscompiles the __weak directive
>  # endif
>  #endif
> @@ -13,11 +13,11 @@
>  #define __must_check 		__attribute__((warn_unused_result))
>  #define __compiler_offsetof(a,b) __builtin_offsetof(a,b)
>  
> -#if __GNUC_MINOR__ > 0
> +#if GCC_VERSION >= 40100

I can't seem to recall so did we explain already why ">= 40100" instead
of "> 40000"?

I mean, it is the same, but still...

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/