[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1597360.JT7plJlUsZ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:43:46 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
pdsw-power-team@....com, arvind.chauhan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code
On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 11:37:13 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 October 2012 14:16, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On 20 October 2012 01:42, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> Initially ondemand governor was written and then using its code conservative
> >> governor is written. It used a lot of code from ondemand governor, but copy of
> >> code was created instead of using the same routines from both governors. Which
> >> increased code redundancy, which is difficult to manage.
> >>
> >> This patch is an attempt to move common part of both the governors to
> >> cpufreq_governor.c file to come over above mentioned issues.
> >>
> >> This shouldn't change anything from functionality point of view.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> For everybody else, this patch is already pushed by Rafael in his linux-next
> branch.
Well, not yet, although I'm going to do that.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists