linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v8 0/5] IPC: checkpoint/restore in userspace enhancements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121024144230.a932f2e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:42:30 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc:	serge.hallyn@...onical.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com,
	catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, jmorris@...ei.org,
	cmetcalf@...era.com, joe.korty@...r.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
	dledford@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	serue@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	devel@...nvz.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 0/5] IPC: checkpoint/restore in userspace
 enhancements

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:34:51 +0400
Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com> wrote:

> This respin of the patch set was significantly reworked. Most part of new API
> was replaced by sysctls (by one per messages, semaphores and shared memory),
> allowing to preset desired id for next new IPC object.
> 
> This patch set is aimed to provide additional functionality for all IPC
> objects, which is required for migration of these objects by user-space
> checkpoint/restore utils (CRIU).
> 
> The main problem here was impossibility to set up object id. This patch set
> solves the problem by adding new sysctls for preset of desired id for new IPC
> object.
> 
> Another problem was to peek messages from queues without deleting them.
> This was achived by introducing of new MSG_COPY flag for sys_msgrcv(). If
> MSG_COPY flag is set, then msgtyp is interpreted as message number.

OK, thanks, I grabbed these.  They're not the worst c/r patches I've
ever seen ;)

I'm not seeing any evidence that anyone else has reviewed or tested
these?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/