[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2295104.eQ6lcDpNzT@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:15:20 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Don't leak next_walk_state in acpi_ds_call_control_method()
On Sunday 21 of October 2012 22:35:46 Jesper Juhl wrote:
> If acpi_ds_create_walk_state() succeeds, but the call to
> ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED() fails, then we'll return from the function
> without properly freeing 'next_walk_state'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
This has to go through ACPICA upstream, but we'll get it from there eventually.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
> index aa9a5d4..ade59a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
> @@ -378,7 +378,8 @@ acpi_ds_call_control_method(struct acpi_thread_state *thread,
> */
> info = ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(struct acpi_evaluate_info));
> if (!info) {
> - return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_MEMORY);
> + status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
> + goto cleanup;
> }
>
> info->parameters = &this_walk_state->operands[0];
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists