[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121024222854.GA1891@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:28:54 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@...itl.com>
Cc: Victor Manuel Jaquez Leal <vjaquez@...lia.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] staging: tidspbridge fixes for 3.7
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:09:14PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> With 3.7-rc1 changes:
>
> - New irq numbering in OMAP3 broke the driver request for a mmu irq,
> until this is migrated to the common iommu framework we can only
> hardcode the new number.
> - _raw_* accessors changed a type of one of their parameters with patch
> "195bbca ARM: 7500/1: io: avoid writeback addressing modes for
> __raw_ accessors", so the build system was filled with warnings from
> the old parameter usage.
>
> Omar Ramirez Luna (6):
> staging: tidspbridge: request the right irq for mmu
> staging: tidspbridge: drop const from custom mmu implementation
> staging: tidspbridge: change type to __iomem for per and core
> addresses
> staging: tidspbridge: ioremap dsp sync addr
> staging: tidspbridge: ioremap physical address of the stack segment
> in shm
> staging: tidspbridge: delete unused mmu functions
Are the "fix up the compiler warning" patches really needed for 3.7?
Are they new in 3.7-rc1? Or were they there before in 3.6?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists