linux-kernel - Re: [Request for review] Revised delete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKi4VA+tW30=8c18kNXVrw+v2x9=kQEYoF7Yjck6C98wHpNs0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:27:11 -0200
From:	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
To:	mtk.manpages@...il.com
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Subject: Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

Hi Michael,


On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
> Ping!
>
> Rusty (et al.) I'm pretty sure the new page text is okay, but I would
> like someone knowledgeable to confirm.

One more thing:

> .SH "SEE ALSO"
> .BR create_module (2),
> .BR init_module (2),
> .BR query_module (2),
> .BR lsmod (8),
> .BR rmmod (8)

Shouldn't we remove the reference to query_module(2) and
create_module(2)? They don't exist anymore (and I miss a bigger
warning on their man pages).

Last, I think there should be a ref here to modprobe (because of -r
flag), not lsmod. The rest looks good.


Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/