[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121024054114.GA9787@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:41:14 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
Cc: arm@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pwm: vt8500: Update vt8500 PWM driver support
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:46:58PM +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> This patch updates pwm-vt8500.c to support devicetree probing and
> make use of the common clock subsystem.
>
> A binding document describing the PWM controller found on
> arch-vt8500 is also included.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
> ---
> v2/v3:
> Fix errors/coding style as pointed out by Thierry Reding.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/vt8500-pwm.txt | 17 ++++
> drivers/pwm/pwm-vt8500.c | 86 ++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/vt8500-pwm.txt
Looking real good now. One last comment though and I think I'm ready to
take this...
> + err = clk_enable(vt8500->clk);
> + if (err < 0)
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
> + };
Why do you return EBUSY instead of err?
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists