| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121025082341.GC3348@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:23:41 +0100 From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: Update clock handling for the pinctrl-nomadik GPIO driver On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: > On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf > >is still working on that one. > > > >So do you want me to remove this patch? > > > > Yeah drop it for now. Actually, a quick question before I do: If it's better/faster to prepare the clock and keep it prepared while you do clk_enable/clk_disable, why don't we do that in all drivers? Why do we bother to prepare/unprepare each time if all it does is take up cycles? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists