[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121025122243.GD29674@mail.gnudd.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:22:43 +0200
From: Davide Ciminaghi <ciminaghi@...dd.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, rubini@...dd.com, giancarlo.asnaghi@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] drivers/mfd/sta2x11-mfd: add regmap support
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:49:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:31:18PM +0200, Davide Ciminaghi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 06:18:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
...
>
> > My opinion is that passing function pointers for
> > readable/writeable/precious/volatile methods could still be useful when
> > registers' features or access properties can change at runtime (for instance a
>
> This is essential for sparse register maps, really.
yes, I realized that when updating sta2x11-mfd to the new table driven approach
yesterday. One more thing I found is that you can have the case in which, for
instance, almost all readable registers are also writeable. To address such a
case, I added the possibility for a user to specify ranges for which a given
property is false, so that, in the above example, you first check whether a
given register belongs to the non-writeable region and then maybe skip the
other checks.
I'm sending a regmap patch in few minutes.
Thanks and regards
Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists