linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/31] x86/mm: Reduce tlb flushes from ptep_set_access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxRh43832cEW39t0+d1Sdz46Up6Za9w641jpWukmi4zFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:17:19 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/31] x86/mm: Reduce tlb flushes from ptep_set_access_flags()

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>
> @@ -306,11 +306,26 @@ int ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area
>                           pte_t entry, int dirty)
>  {
>         int changed = !pte_same(*ptep, entry);
> +       /*
> +        * If the page used to be inaccessible (_PAGE_PROTNONE), or
> +        * this call upgrades the access permissions on the same page,
> +        * it is safe to skip the remote TLB flush.
> +        */
> +       bool flush_remote = false;
> +       if (!pte_accessible(*ptep))
> +               flush_remote = false;
> +       else if (pte_pfn(*ptep) != pte_pfn(entry) ||
> +                       (pte_write(*ptep) && !pte_write(entry)) ||
> +                       (pte_exec(*ptep) && !pte_exec(entry)))
> +               flush_remote = true;
>
>         if (changed && dirty) {

Did anybody ever actually look at this sh*t-for-brains patch?

Yeah, I'm grumpy. But I'm wasting time looking at patches that have
new code in them that is stupid and retarded.

This is the VM, guys, we don't add stupid and retarded code.

LOOK at the code, for chrissake. Just look at it. And if you don't see
why the above is stupid and retarded, you damn well shouldn't be
touching VM code.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/