linux-kernel - PCI/PM: Add comments for PME poll support for PCIe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1351228071-15161-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:07:51 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: PCI/PM: Add comments for PME poll support for PCIe

There are comments on why PME poll support is necessary for PCI
devices, but not for PCIe devices.  That may lead to misunderstanding
that PME poll is only necessary for PCI devices.  So add comments
related to PCIe PME poll to make it more clear.

The content of comments comes from the changelog of commit:

379021d5c0899fcf9410cae4ca7a59a5a94ca769

Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1578,15 +1578,25 @@ void pci_pme_active(struct pci_dev *dev,
 
 	pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, pmcsr);
 
-	/* PCI (as opposed to PCIe) PME requires that the device have
-	   its PME# line hooked up correctly. Not all hardware vendors
-	   do this, so the PME never gets delivered and the device
-	   remains asleep. The easiest way around this is to
-	   periodically walk the list of suspended devices and check
-	   whether any have their PME flag set. The assumption is that
-	   we'll wake up often enough anyway that this won't be a huge
-	   hit, and the power savings from the devices will still be a
-	   win. */
+	/*
+	 * PCI (as opposed to PCIe) PME requires that the device have
+	 * its PME# line hooked up correctly. Not all hardware vendors
+	 * do this, so the PME never gets delivered and the device
+	 * remains asleep. The easiest way around this is to
+	 * periodically walk the list of suspended devices and check
+	 * whether any have their PME flag set. The assumption is that
+	 * we'll wake up often enough anyway that this won't be a huge
+	 * hit, and the power savings from the devices will still be a
+	 * win.
+	 *
+	 * Although PCIe uses in-band PME message instead of PME# line
+	 * to report PME, PME does not work for some PCIe devices in
+	 * reality.  For example, there are devices that set their PME
+	 * status bits, but don't really bother to send a PME message;
+	 * there are PCI Express Root Ports that don't bother to
+	 * trigger interrupts when they receive PME messages from the
+	 * devices below.  So PME poll is used for PCIe devices too.
+	 */
 
 	if (dev->pme_poll) {
 		struct pci_pme_device *pme_dev;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/