[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121026165713.19106iudy5h4nvbw@guarana.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:57:13 +1100
From: Kevin Easton <kevin@...rana.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] firmware loader: introduce module parameter to
customize fw search path
Quoting Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:38:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> It's valid to cast a non-const pointer to a const one. It's the
>> *other* way around that is invalid.
>>
>> So marking fw_path[] as having 'const char *' elements just means that
>> we won't be changing those elements through the fw_path[] array
>> (correct: we only read them). The fact that one of those same pointers
>> is then also available through a non-const pointer variable means that
>> they can change through *that* pointer, but that doesn't change the
>> fact that fw_path[] itself contains const pointers.
>>
>> Remember: in C, a "const pointer" does *not* mean that the thing it
>> points to cannot change. It only means that it cannot change through
>> *that* pointer.
>
> It's a bit trickier, unfortunately - pointer to pointer to const char
> and pointer to pointer to char do not mix. Just for fun, try to constify
> envp and argv arguments of call_usermodehelper()...
That's because if it _was_ allowed, you could use it to silently
launder the const away:
const char *c = "rodata";
char *x;
const char **y;
y = &x;
*y = c;
/* We now have (const char) values accessible through a (char *) pointer x */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists