[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC82923353723C7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 06:18:23 +0000
From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Xen acpi pad implement
Thanks! updated accordingly, w/ 2 comments left as below:
> +static const struct acpi_device_id pad_device_ids[] = {
> + {"ACPI000C", 0},
> + {"", 0},
> +};
> +
> +static struct acpi_driver xen_acpi_pad_driver = {
> + .name = "processor_aggregator",
> + .class = ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS,
> + .ids = pad_device_ids,
> + .ops = {
> + .add = xen_acpi_pad_add,
.remove?
[Jinsong] .remove method not used by any logic now (any possible point use it?), so we remove it from our former patch.
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init xen_acpi_pad_init(void)
> +{
> + /* Only DOM0 is responsible for Xen acpi pad */
> + if (xen_initial_domain())
> + return acpi_bus_register_driver(&xen_acpi_pad_driver);
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(xen_acpi_pad_init);
> +
> +#endif
Overall I'd recommend taking a look at the cleaned up driver in
our kernels.
[Jinsong] What's your point here?
Thanks,
Jinsong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists