[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121026065855.GA9179@localhost>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:58:55 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Ni zhan Chen <nizhan.chen@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
YingHang Zhu <casualfisher@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: readahead: remove redundant ra_pages in file_ra_state
> static void shrink_readahead_size_eio(struct file *filp,
> struct file_ra_state *ra)
> {
> - ra->ra_pages /= 4;
> + spin_lock(&filp->f_lock);
> + filp->f_mode |= FMODE_RANDOM;
> + spin_unlock(&filp->f_lock);
>
> As the example in comment above this function, the read maybe still
> sequential, and it will waste IO bandwith if modify to FMODE_RANDOM
> directly.
Yes immediately disabling readahead may hurt IO performance, the
original '/ 4' may perform better when there are only 1-3 IO errors
encountered.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists