linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Don't return -EPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYPbs34Ob+MN9tjevXPTwGnEYsyJG0LMjCqsfxP=S_FJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:26:33 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Don't return -EPROBE_DEFER to sysfs, or for
 invalid gpios

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Mathias Nyman
<mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> gpios requested with invalid numbers, or gpios requested from userspace via sysfs
> should not try to be deferred on failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>

Very good catch. I applied this to my fixes branch and also
put the stable tag on this thing, it goes way back to the introduction
of deffered probe.

Mark: OK with this?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/