[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121026075919.GA18211@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:59:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/31] mm/mpol: Remove NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT
* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> writes:
>
> > Since the NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT statistic is useless on its
> > own; it wants to be compared to either a total of interleave
> > allocations or to a miss count, remove it.
> >
> > Fixing it would be possible, but since we've gone years
> > without these statistics I figure we can continue that way.
> >
> > Also NUMA_HIT fully includes NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT so users
> > might switch to using that.
> >
> > This cleans up some of the weird MPOL_INTERLEAVE allocation
> > exceptions.
>
> NACK, as already posted several times.
>
> This breaks the numactl test suite, which is the only way
> currently to test interleaving.
This patch is not essential to the NUMA series so I've zapped it
from the patch queue and fixed up the roll-on effects.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists