lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1351241067-9521-9-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:44:24 +0200
From:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
To:	"benjamin.tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] HID: hid-multitouch: fix Win 8 protocol

Win 8 specification is much more precise than the Win 7 one.
Moreover devices that need to take certification must be submitted
to Microsoft.

The result is a better protocol support and we can rely on that to
skip all the messy tests we used to do.

The protocol specify the fact that each valid touch must be reported
within a frame, and that the release touch coordinate must be the
same than the last known touch.
So we can use the always_valid quirk and dismiss reports when we
touch coordiante do not follow this rule.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
---
 drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 43bd8e8..bd23f19 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -510,6 +510,18 @@ static void mt_complete_slot(struct mt_device *td, struct input_dev *input)
 		int slotnum = mt_compute_slot(td, input);
 		struct mt_slot *s = &td->curdata;
 
+		if (td->mtclass.quirks & MT_QUIRK_WIN_8_CERTIFIED &&
+		    !s->touch_state) {
+			struct input_mt_slot *slot = &input->mt->slots[slotnum];
+			int prv_x = input_mt_get_value(slot, ABS_MT_POSITION_X);
+			int prv_y = input_mt_get_value(slot, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y);
+			/* valid releases occurs when the last x and y positions
+			 * are the same as the last known touch. */
+			if (!input_mt_is_active(slot) ||
+			    prv_x != s->x || prv_y != s->y)
+				return;
+		}
+
 		if (slotnum < 0 || slotnum >= td->maxcontacts)
 			return;
 
@@ -681,8 +693,8 @@ static void mt_post_parse_default_settings(struct mt_device *td)
 {
 	__s32 quirks = td->mtclass.quirks;
 
-	/* unknown serial device needs special quirks */
-	if (td->touches_by_report == 1) {
+	/* unknown serial devices or win8 ones need special quirks */
+	if (td->touches_by_report == 1 || quirks & MT_QUIRK_WIN_8_CERTIFIED) {
 		quirks |= MT_QUIRK_ALWAYS_VALID;
 		quirks &= ~MT_QUIRK_NOT_SEEN_MEANS_UP;
 		quirks &= ~MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_INRANGE;
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ