[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508A54E4.2060108@antcom.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:16:20 +0200
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: kernel@...gutronix.de, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"tru@...k-microwave.de" <tru@...k-microwave.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mach-imx: CAN clock fix for i.MX53
Hi!
On 10/26/2012 10:59 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:26:40PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> This patch fixes CAN clocking on i.MX53.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
>>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c
>> @@ -426,10 +426,10 @@ int __init mx53_clocks_init(unsigned lon
>> clk[usb_phy2_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("usb_phy2_gate", "usb_phy_sel", MXC_CCM_CCGR4, 12);
>> clk[can_sel] = imx_clk_mux("can_sel", MXC_CCM_CSCMR2, 6, 2,
>> mx53_can_sel, ARRAY_SIZE(mx53_can_sel));
>> - clk[can1_serial_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("can1_serial_gate", "can_sel", MXC_CCM_CCGR6, 22);
>> - clk[can1_ipg_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("can1_ipg_gate", "ipg", MXC_CCM_CCGR6, 20);
>> - clk[can2_serial_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("can2_serial_gate", "can_sel", MXC_CCM_CCGR4, 8);
>> - clk[can2_ipg_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("can2_ipg_gate", "ipg", MXC_CCM_CCGR4, 6);
>
> I just rechecked. The above matches the i.MX53 Reference Manual rev 2.1
>
>> + clk[can1_serial_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("can1_serial_gate", "can_sel", MXC_CCM_CCGR4, 6);
>> + clk[can1_ipg_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("can1_ipg_gate", "ipg", MXC_CCM_CCGR4, 8);
>> + clk[can2_serial_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("can2_serial_gate", "can_sel", MXC_CCM_CCGR4, 6);
>> + clk[can2_ipg_gate] = imx_clk_gate2("can2_ipg_gate", "ipg", MXC_CCM_CCGR4, 8);
>
> This doesn't.
This may be right, but unfortunately, since the introduction of your
can1 + can2 clocking change, the first block stopped working for me.
My above patch is basically a rollback which works for the first block.
An interesting hint is: can2 (which was the only one defined _before_
your can1 + can2 change) didn't work before and afterwards at all. (But
I'm not using it anyway.)
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists