lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6329232.eg8Mc603Uh@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:14:37 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	'Daniel Lezcano' <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: add missing header include

On Friday, October 26, 2012 01:30:07 PM Jingoo Han wrote:
> This patch adds missing device.h header to fix build warnings as below:
> 
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> [enabled by default]
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:27:45: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> In file included from drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:15:0:
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> [enabled by default]
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:27:45: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> 
> This build warning is introduced by commit efeca1b
> "cpuidle / sysfs: change function parameter".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>

I fixed up the original patch.

Daniel, I must say I'm less and less impressed by the quality of code
I'm getting from you.  Please improve it.

Thanks,
Rafael


> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
> index a5bbd1c..2120d9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>  #ifndef __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H
>  #define __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H
>  
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +
>  /* For internal use only */
>  extern struct cpuidle_governor *cpuidle_curr_governor;
>  extern struct list_head cpuidle_governors;
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ