[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121026111109.GA8195@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:11:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it, nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@...tn.it, dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...csson.com, liming.wang@...driver.com,
jkacur@...hat.com, harald.gustafsson@...csson.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] math128: Introduce various 128bit primitives
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> I had hoped the u128 stuff might be elsewise useful, but if we
> don't want to go there, that's fine.
I think it needs a clearer usecase - and even then the 32-bit
behavior still looks rather horrible ...
So if we can escape all that with reasonable restrictions then
that's far better than taking on this kind of overhead for
32-bit systems. 32-bit still matters, we do the ktime_t
complications for 32-bit systems and that's for a far smaller
effect.
[ Would be nice to also stick in a WARN_ONCE() in the key
place(s) just in case, to make sure the overflow cannot happen
silently in the future. ]
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists