[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121026134129.GA31306@otc-wbsnb-06>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:41:29 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] numa, mm: drop redundant check in
do_huge_pmd_numa_page()
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 03:08:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 15:54 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > We check if the pmd entry is the same as on pmd_trans_huge() in
> > handle_mm_fault(). That's enough.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Ah indeed, Will mentioned something like this on IRC as well, I hadn't
> gotten around to looking at it -- now have, thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>
> That said, where in handle_mm_fault() do we wait for a split to
> complete? We have a pmd_trans_huge() && !pmd_trans_splitting(), so a
> fault on a currently splitting pmd will fall through.
>
> Is it the return from the fault on unlikely(pmd_trans_huge()) ?
Yes, this code will catch it:
/* if an huge pmd materialized from under us just retry later */
if (unlikely(pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)))
return 0;
If the pmd is under splitting it's still a pmd_trans_huge().
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists