linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/33] perf, x86: Support Haswell v4 LBR format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1351283415-13170-8-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:29:49 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	acme@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
	eranian@...gle.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/33] perf, x86: Support Haswell v4 LBR format

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

Haswell has two additional LBR from flags for TSX: intx and abort, implemented
as a new v4 version of the LBR format.

Handle those in and adjust the sign extension code to still correctly extend.
The flags are exported similarly in the LBR record to the existing misprediction
flag

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/perf_event.h                 |    7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index da02e9c..2af6695b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ enum {
 	LBR_FORMAT_LIP		= 0x01,
 	LBR_FORMAT_EIP		= 0x02,
 	LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS	= 0x03,
+	LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2	= 0x04,
 };
 
 /*
@@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ enum {
 	 LBR_FAR)
 
 #define LBR_FROM_FLAG_MISPRED  (1ULL << 63)
+#define LBR_FROM_FLAG_INTX     (1ULL << 62)
+#define LBR_FROM_FLAG_ABORT    (1ULL << 61)
 
 #define for_each_branch_sample_type(x) \
 	for ((x) = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER; \
@@ -270,21 +273,30 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
 		unsigned long lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
-		u64 from, to, mis = 0, pred = 0;
+		u64 from, to, mis = 0, pred = 0, intx = 0, abort = 0;
 
 		rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + lbr_idx, from);
 		rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to   + lbr_idx, to);
 
-		if (lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS) {
+		if (lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS ||
+		    lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2) {
 			mis = !!(from & LBR_FROM_FLAG_MISPRED);
 			pred = !mis;
-			from = (u64)((((s64)from) << 1) >> 1);
+			if (lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS)
+				from = (u64)((((s64)from) << 1) >> 1);
+			else if (lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2) {
+				intx = !!(from & LBR_FROM_FLAG_INTX);
+				abort = !!(from & LBR_FROM_FLAG_ABORT);
+				from = (u64)((((s64)from) << 3) >> 3);
+			}
 		}
 
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from	= from;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to		= to;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].mispred	= mis;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].predicted	= pred;
+		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].intx	= intx;
+		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].abort	= abort;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved	= 0;
 	}
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 2e90235..0e528fc 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -74,13 +74,18 @@ struct perf_raw_record {
  *
  * support for mispred, predicted is optional. In case it
  * is not supported mispred = predicted = 0.
+ *
+ *     intx: running in a hardware transaction
+ *     abort: aborting a hardware transaction
  */
 struct perf_branch_entry {
 	__u64	from;
 	__u64	to;
 	__u64	mispred:1,  /* target mispredicted */
 		predicted:1,/* target predicted */
-		reserved:62;
+		intx:1,	    /* in transaction */
+		abort:1,    /* transaction abort */
+		reserved:60;
 };
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/