[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121026000032.459789873@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:05:31 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [ 13/85] ring-buffer: Check for uninitialized cpu buffer before resizing
3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
commit 8e49f418c9632790bf456634742d34d97120a784 upstream.
With a system where, num_present_cpus < num_possible_cpus, even if all
CPUs are online, non-present CPUs don't have per_cpu buffers allocated.
If per_cpu/<cpu>/buffer_size_kb is modified for such a CPU, it can cause
a panic due to NULL dereference in ring_buffer_resize().
To fix this, resize operation is allowed only if the per-cpu buffer has
been initialized.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1349912427-6486-1-git-send-email-vnagarnaik@google.com
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1567,6 +1567,10 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct ring_buffe
put_online_cpus();
} else {
+ /* Make sure this CPU has been intitialized */
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_id, buffer->cpumask))
+ goto out;
+
cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu_id];
if (nr_pages == cpu_buffer->nr_pages)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists