linux-kernel - Re: [ 60/85] xtensa: add missing system calls to the syscall table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1351362392.4834.17.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:26:32 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [ 60/85] xtensa: add missing system calls to the syscall table

On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 17:06 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 3.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
> 
> commit 7216cabfff5149670445cd65d415ed5db21314b4 upstream.
> 
> Add the following system calls to the syscall table:
[...]
>  #define __NR_available287			287
> -__SYSCALL(287, sys_faccessat, 0)
> +__SYSCALL(287, sys_ni_syscall, 0)
[...]

Why was this one un-plumbed rather than properly numbered (#define
__NR_faccessat)?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)