[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1210272118590.2756@ionos>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:19:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Remove bogus smp_processor_id()
usage
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Thomas.
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 07:29:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > This is fully preemptible non cpu bound context though the comment in the
> > code says:
> >
> > * Must run on @pol->cpu. cpufreq core is responsible for ensuring
> > * that we're bound to the current CPU and pol->cpu stays online.
> >
> > The core only guarantees that pol->cpu stays online, but it has no way
> > to bind the thread and this needs to be fully preemptible context as
> > powernowk8_target_fn() calls functions which might sleep.
> >
> > So the correct solution is to always go through work_on_cpu().
>
> Yeah, that was stupid. Rafael already has a patch queued.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git;a=commit;h=e4df1cbcc1f329e53a1fff7450b2229e0addff20
>
Good. So more people noticed :)
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists