[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121027211436.GB4564@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:14:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
festevam@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Fix printing of size_t variable
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:52:32PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
There's not much point in doing this after a patch has been applied...
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135041943424273&w=2
So, the difference between Fabio's patch and your patch is that he sent
the patch in the normal fashion and didn't do the random extra stuff I
keep mentioning when I apply your patches. The things you do like the
random recipient lists and CCs in the text of the mail get in the way
and mean that for things like minor warning fixes the patch is likely to
get deferred for a big mailbox cleanup or (like this time) superceeded
by a version that's easier to deal with.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists