[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1351372847-13625-2-git-send-email-cesarb@cesarb.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:20:46 -0200
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm: refactor reinsert of swap_info in sys_swapoff
The block within sys_swapoff which re-inserts the swap_info into the
swap_list in case of failure of try_to_unuse() reads a few values outside
the swap_lock. While this is safe at that point, it is subtle code.
Simplify the code by moving the reading of these values to a separate
function, refactoring it a bit so they are read from within the
swap_lock. This is easier to understand, and matches better the way it
worked before I unified the insertion of the swap_info from both
sys_swapon and sys_swapoff.
This change should make no functional difference. The only real change
is moving the read of two or three structure fields to within the lock
(frontswap_map_get() is nothing more than a read of p->frontswap_map).
Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 71cd288..886db96 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -1443,13 +1443,12 @@ static int setup_swap_extents(struct swap_info_struct *sis, sector_t *span)
return generic_swapfile_activate(sis, swap_file, span);
}
-static void enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
+static void _enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
unsigned char *swap_map,
unsigned long *frontswap_map)
{
int i, prev;
- spin_lock(&swap_lock);
if (prio >= 0)
p->prio = prio;
else
@@ -1473,6 +1472,21 @@ static void enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
else
swap_info[prev]->next = p->type;
frontswap_init(p->type);
+}
+
+static void enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
+ unsigned char *swap_map,
+ unsigned long *frontswap_map)
+{
+ spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+ _enable_swap_info(p, prio, swap_map, frontswap_map);
+ spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+}
+
+static void reinsert_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p)
+{
+ spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+ _enable_swap_info(p, p->prio, p->swap_map, frontswap_map_get(p));
spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
}
@@ -1549,14 +1563,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
compare_swap_oom_score_adj(OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX, oom_score_adj);
if (err) {
- /*
- * reading p->prio and p->swap_map outside the lock is
- * safe here because only sys_swapon and sys_swapoff
- * change them, and there can be no other sys_swapon or
- * sys_swapoff for this swap_info_struct at this point.
- */
/* re-insert swap space back into swap_list */
- enable_swap_info(p, p->prio, p->swap_map, frontswap_map_get(p));
+ reinsert_swap_info(p);
goto out_dput;
}
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists