[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <873910xevu.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:45:25 +0100
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
[nfs people purged from Cc]
On 27 Oct 2012, Theodore Ts'o verbalised:
> Huh? It's not turned on by default. If you mount with no mount
> options, journal checksums are *not* turned on.
?! it's turned on for me, and though I use weird mount options I don't
use that one:
/dev/main/var /var ext4 defaults,nobarrier,usrquota,grpquota,nosuid,nodev,relatime,journal_async_commit,commit=30,user_xattr,acl 1 2
Default mount options: (none)
/dev/mapper/main-var /var ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,journal_checksum,journal_async_commit,nobarrier,quota,usrquota,grpquota,commit=30,stripe=16,data=ordered,usrquota,grpquota 0 0
...
Ah! it's turned on by journal_async_commit. OK, that alone argues
against use of journal_async_commit, tested or not, and I'd not have
turned it on if I'd noticed that.
(So, the combinations I'll be trying for effect on this bug are:
journal_async_commit (as now)
journal_checksum
none
Technically to investigate all possibilities we should try
journal_async_commit,no_journal_checksum, but this seems so unlikely to
have ever been tested by anyone that it's not worth looking into...)
--
NULL && (void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists