[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508C9405.5030600@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:10:13 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 REPOST 2/2] kbuild: run the pre-processor on *.dts
files
On 10/27/2012 07:06 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:57:50PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> Like I said previously, I think we first need guidelines on what
> is and
> isn't acceptable use of C preprocessor in dts files.
>
>
> Didn't we already say that it was just the same rules as for things tht
> get included in .S files? Besides for plain .dts files (as opposed to
> .dtsi files) it seems like if people break things they get to keep all
> the pieces without disrupting other people too much.
>
>
> Yes, but can we document that. Also, I'd like others with more DT
> historical knowledge to weigh in.
OK. What's the appropriate file to document that in? I assume you're not
just looking for an explanation in the commit description?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists