linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] r8169: Fix WoL on RTL8168d/8111d.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:05:23 +0100
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>
Cc:	nic_swsd@...ltek.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Fix WoL on RTL8168d/8111d.

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org> :
> This regression was spotted between Debian squeeze and Debian wheezy
> kernels (respectively based on 2.6.32 and 3.2). The fix was inspired
> by <http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg178543.html>, using
> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_{25,26} for the RTL8168d/8111d chipset.

If someone experiences problems or has questions about WoL with
Realtek's 816x chipsets, http://marc.info/?t=132079219400004 would
imho be a better reference.

[...]
> Tested on top of a 3.2.23 kernel.

It should still be relevant for current kernel. I'll give it a try.

[...]
> It looks like RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_{25,26} are kinda supposed to go
> together so I kept both. Florent's testing gave the following results:
>  - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_25 only: FAIL.
>  - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_26 only: SUCCESS.
>  - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_25 + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_26: SUCCESS.

I don't understand the VER_25 vs VER_26 difference.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/