[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121028231546.844813930@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:16:08 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [ 032/105] timekeeping: Cast raw_interval to u64 to avoid shift overflow
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
commit 5b3900cd409466c0070b234d941650685ad0c791 upstream.
We fixed a bunch of integer overflows in timekeeping code during the 3.6
cycle. I did an audit based on that and found this potential overflow.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20121009071823.GA19159@elgon.mountain
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context; use timekeeper.raw_interval]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(
}
/* Accumulate raw time */
- raw_nsecs = timekeeper.raw_interval << shift;
+ raw_nsecs = (u64)timekeeper.raw_interval << shift;
raw_nsecs += raw_time.tv_nsec;
if (raw_nsecs >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
u64 raw_secs = raw_nsecs;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists