lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121028231549.745388506@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:16:17 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...el.com>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: [ 041/105] Bluetooth: SMP: Fix setting unknown auth_req bits

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...el.com>

commit 065a13e2cc665f6547dc7e8a9d6b6565badf940a upstream.

When sending a pairing request or response we should not just blindly
copy the value that the remote device sent. Instead we should at least
make sure to mask out any unknown bits. This is particularly critical
from the upcoming LE Secure Connections feature perspective as
incorrectly indicating support for it (by copying the remote value)
would cause a failure to pair with devices that support it.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...el.com>
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 net/bluetooth/smp.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
 
 #define SMP_TIMEOUT 30000 /* 30 seconds */
 
+#define AUTH_REQ_MASK   0x07
+
 static inline void swap128(u8 src[16], u8 dst[16])
 {
 	int i;
@@ -206,7 +208,7 @@ static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2c
 		req->max_key_size = SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
 		req->init_key_dist = dist_keys;
 		req->resp_key_dist = dist_keys;
-		req->auth_req = authreq;
+		req->auth_req = (authreq & AUTH_REQ_MASK);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -215,7 +217,7 @@ static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2c
 	rsp->max_key_size = SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
 	rsp->init_key_dist = req->init_key_dist & dist_keys;
 	rsp->resp_key_dist = req->resp_key_dist & dist_keys;
-	rsp->auth_req = authreq;
+	rsp->auth_req = (authreq & AUTH_REQ_MASK);
 }
 
 static u8 check_enc_key_size(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 max_key_size)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ