[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508D12DC.8010400@ti.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:41:24 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
CC: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux DaVinci Kernel List
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux SPI Devel List
<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] ARM: edma: add AM33XX crossbar event support
On 10/18/2012 6:56 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> Adds support for the per-EDMA channel event mux. This is required
> for any peripherals using DMA crossbar mapped events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/common/edma.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/platform_data/edma.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/edma.c b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> index 6d2a590..b761b7a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> @@ -1425,6 +1425,53 @@ static int edma_of_read_u32_to_s16_array(const struct device_node *np,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int edma_xbar_event_map(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *node,
> + struct edma_soc_info *pdata, int len)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i;
> + struct resource res;
> + void *xbar;
> + s16 (*xbar_chans)[2];
> + u32 shift, offset, mux;
> +
> + xbar_chans = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> + len/sizeof(s16) + 2*sizeof(s16),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!xbar_chans)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 1, &res);
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + xbar = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start, resource_size(&res));
> + if (!xbar)
> + return -EIO;
-ENOMEM is more appropiate for ioremap failures.
> +
> + ret = edma_of_read_u32_to_s16_array(node,
> + "ti,edma-xbar-event-map",
> + (s16 *)xbar_chans,
> + len/sizeof(u32));
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + for (i = 0; xbar_chans[i][0] != -1; i++) {
> + shift = (xbar_chans[i][1] % 4) * 8;
> + offset = xbar_chans[i][1] >> 2;
> + offset <<= 2;
> + mux = __raw_readl((void *)((u32)xbar + offset));
Dont use __raw* variants of io accessors. There will be ordering issues
on ARMv7.
> + mux &= (~(0xff << shift));
> + mux |= (xbar_chans[i][0] << shift);
Unnecessary parens above.
> + __raw_writel(mux, (void *)((u32)xbar + offset));
> + }
> +
> + pdata->xbar_chans = xbar_chans;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int edma_of_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> struct device_node *node,
> struct edma_soc_info *pdata)
> @@ -1453,7 +1500,6 @@ static int edma_of_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> pdata->n_slot = value;
>
> pdata->n_cc = 1;
> - /* This is unused */
The comment should have not been part of 4/16?
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists