linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 014/193] arch/m68k: remove CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLpM_qvP65rXgjC-UV7Hc=-Lg17jtv0=dVUGHYJ_jB+tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:41:27 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 014/193] arch/m68k: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
>> almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel
>> summit, remove it.
>>
>> CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> Or do you want me to take this through the m68k tree?

Stephen Rothwell has mentioned he'd prefer maintainers take these
patches into their trees, but I'm happy to carry them in mine if you
want to avoid the hassle. I'm doing this for several areas already.
It's up to you, but just let me know so I can either drop it from my
tree or move it to my linux-next tree. :)

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/