[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508E886C.20908@parallels.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:45:16 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] memcg: split mem_cgroup_force_empty into reclaiming
and reparenting parts
On 10/26/2012 03:37 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> mem_cgroup_force_empty did two separate things depending on free_all
> parameter from the very beginning. It either reclaimed as many pages as
> possible and moved the rest to the parent or just moved charges to the
> parent. The first variant is used as memory.force_empty callback while
> the later is used from the mem_cgroup_pre_destroy.
>
> The whole games around gotos are far from being nice and there is no
> reason to keep those two functions inside one. Let's split them and
> also move the responsibility for css reference counting to their callers
> to make to code easier.
>
> This patch doesn't have any functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists