[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1351521477.8467.78.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:37:57 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] printk: Wake up klogd using irq_work
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 14:28 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> klogd is woken up asynchronously from the tick in order
> to do it safely.
>
> However if printk is called when the tick is stopped, the reader
> won't be woken up until the next interrupt, which might not fire
> before a while. As a result, the user may miss some message.
Just a grammar nit (and goes for your previous patch as well). We say
"might not fire for a while." or you could say ".. for some time", but
not "before a while" ;-)
I wounder what the French translation of that is.
-- Steve
>
> To fix this, lets implement the printk tick using a lazy irq work.
> This subsystem takes care of the timer tick state and can
> fix up accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists