linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] UniCore32 update for v3.7-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy-J-ywFhZGoBqO2ih6Hk1=hJfz2VQO8d0pZ2+V0_mpQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:04:27 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	guanxuetao <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] UniCore32 update for v3.7-rc2

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:05 PM, guanxuetao <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn> wrote:
>
>   git://github.com/gxt/linux.git unicore32

I *really* want people who use public hosting to tag their pull
request with a signed tag (and using a gpg key I can see signed by
people). I realize that getting a key signed can sometimes be
problematic depending on geography etc, and I don't know where you are
based.

For something like unicore32, I could be convinced to even accept a
key that isn't signed by people I recognize - even if it doesn't
necessarily show identity, it does show that the person who keeps
asking me to pull controls the same key over time. Not a very strong
guarantee, but it is at least a potential for identity.

           Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/