[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210291340100.18552@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki ISIMATU <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH 08/26] memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead
N_HIGH_MEMORY
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.
> > N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory.
>
> What is the difference of those two?
>
Patch 5 in the series introduces it to be equal to N_HIGH_MEMORY, so
accepting this patch would be an implicit ack of the direction taken
there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists