[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508EF6C1.4000302@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:36:01 -0700
From: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/15] perf report: Add support to accumulate hist
periods
On 10/29/12 12:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Right, so I tried this and I would expect the callchains to be inverted
> too, so that when I expand say 'c' I would see that 'c' calls 'b' for
> 100% which calls 'a' for 100%.
>
> Instead I get the regular callchains, expanding 'c' gives me main calls
> it for 100%.
>
> Adding -G (invert callchains) doesn't make it better, in that case, when
> I expand 'c' we start at '__libc_start_main' instead of 'c'.
>
> Is there anything I'm missing?
>
Sounds like a reasonable expectation.
I tested mainly:
perf report --cumulate -g graph,100,callee
to find the functions with a large amount of CPU time underneath. Then
examined the callgraph without --cumulate. But yeah - it'd be nice to be
able to do both in a single invocation.
Also, when callgraphs are displayed, the percentages are off (> 100%).
Namhyung probably needs to use he->stat_acc->period in a few places as
the denominator instead of he->period.
-Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists