[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121029052707.GA3400@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:57:07 +0530
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] uprobes/powerpc: Don't clear TIF_UPROBE in
do_notify_resume()
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 06:39:25PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Hi Oleg,
> Cleanup. No need to clear TIF_UPROBE, do_notify_resume() does this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c | 4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> index a2dc757..3b99711 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long thread_info_flags)
But this _is_ do_notify_resume()... I don't see this flag cleared
anywhere else.
Did you have something else in mind?
Ananth
> {
> - if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE) {
> - clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> + if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE)
> uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
> - }
>
> if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
> do_signal(regs);
> --
> 1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists