[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508FB063.70206@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:18:03 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Convert tps6586x to irq_domain
Hi Mark/Samuel,
There is one more change for doing cleanups in regulator parsing where I
moved the regulator parsing from mfd to regulator driver:
[PATCH] mfd: tps6586x: move regulator dt parsing to regulator driver
Although this series and above change is independent but I like to go
these in same branch to avoid the merge conflict.
If this is fine to go in same branch theb I can create a new series of
these 3 changes and above change.
These series is already reviewed by Mark.
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks,
Laxman
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:34:47AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> The bit definitions are also different in status and mask register
>> and yes, this will be again problem as we do in isr thread
>> data->status_buf[i]&= ~data->mask_buf[i];
>> So given the constraint, generic will not work here.
> OK, that's a good reason not to use the generic code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists